I think this weeks reading were a lot
easier compared to the week before and that is explained by my newly acquired
skills from last weeks reading. I now know how to handle this amount of texts
within this type. Also was the text that we were supposed to read by Horkheimer
and Adorno a bit different and in my opinion easier to understand than last
weeks. I really appreciated the fourth chapter (The Culture Industry: Enlightenment
as Mass Deception) because it feels very relevant and up to date.
The lecture and seminar was not cancelled
this week, which was a relief, since the theme of the week was very interesting
to discuss and a topic that needed to be discussed. Also the lecture with Leif
before the seminar was good, because he gave a repetition of the subject and
some new perspectives.
The discussions that we had during the
seminar were not so much in direct relation to the texts, which was refreshing
since it was nice to apply it on related topics. Instead we discussed the
theories and notions that were presented in the book, such as culture industry and mass deception in relation to our
society today. I found that interesting because it was something that I had thought
of when I read the text; the theories and thoughts that are presented feels
very modern and relevant and also most applicable on our society, especially
the texts from the chapter about culture.
We also discussed the difference between
myth and science, which was established in connection with the Enlightenment. This
has confused me a bit and leads me to the same question I ended up asking last
week as well; what to we know for sure? Who
says science is the right thing to believe in? An example of the difference,
which still is discussed, is the creation of the universe and our planet earth.
I believe in a more scientific explanation to the creation like maybe the Big
Bang and not the more religious track that some others do. But who knows what
is right? And what makes it more right than the others? I think a lot of it has
to do with your childhood and how you are raised.
To sum up what I have learnt from Theme 3 I
can point out a development of my critical thinking even more. Another thing is
to question things in our society like the mass media and connected industry
and to realize that it has not always been such a large industry as it is
today, even if it feels like that for me.
Also I feel more confident in the coming
seminars because now I know their structure and who the others students in my
group are, which makes me feel more safe and prepared for what to expect from
them.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar